Canada, advocate at odds over compensation for First Nations child victims of state discrimination - APTN NewsAPTN News

Canada, advocate at odds over compensation for First Nations child victims of state discrimination

Justin Brake
Canada could be going to court once again on a child welfare matter.

On Friday Indigenous Services Minister Jane Philpott and national Indigenous leaders announced they would co-develop new child and family services legislation in an effort to put child welfare into the hands of First Nations, Inuit and Metis communities.

But hours after that announcement the Department of Justice sent a letter to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) saying the issue of compensation for children who have suffered in care may have to involve litigation.

The letter, signed by Robert Frater, the chief general counsel for Justice Canada, says the government is “committed to discussing the compensation issue with the parties, and attempting to reach a resolution” to the matter of compensation, “but in view of the fact that we have not yet received final instruction, it is apparent that we will likely have to set the issue down for argument on one or more of the dates agreed upon for the new year.”

That final instruction on compensation, according to a government source, will come from cabinet.

Philpott was questioned on the issue by First Nation leaders Wednesday at the Assembly of First Nations Special Chiefs Assembly in Ottawa.

The minister said Canada wants to settle the compensation issue “without using courts or tribunals — that to me is the way to do it.”

A 2016 CHRT ruling said that Canada denied services to First Nations children living on-reserve, which in turn had adverse impacts on them. The tribunal also said that federal funding mechanisms incentivized the removal of children from their families and placement into state care.

The CHRT ordered the government to cease discriminatory practices against First Nations children, to reform its First Nations Child and Family Services program, to cease applying a narrow interpretation of Jordan’s Principle, and immediately implement the full meaning of Jordan’s Principle.

The tribunal also has jurisdiction to compel government to compensate children who were victims of government’s discriminatory practices, including those who were taken from their families.

While government has begun to change its policies on child welfare, including last week’s promise of new child and family services legislation in the new year, it has not settled the issue of compensation.

Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child & Family Caring Society, says Canada should pay child victims of government discrimination $40,000 each. Justin Brake/APTN News.

Cindy Blackstock of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (FNCFCS), a co-complainant on the case, says government’s messaging on compensation is “confusing,” and that she hopes the matter can be settled out of court, but that the Caring Society is willing to litigate to ensure children receive just compensation for their suffering.

“Canada informed us late Friday night that they wanted to litigate that question [of compensation],” she said, “and today we learn from the minister that they want to sit down.”

Friday marked the tribunal’s deadline for Canada to respond on the matter.

Blackstock said time is of the essence since the tribunal only has jurisdiction to compel government’s actions on the matter until March 2019.

“So at this point I guess we’ll be preparing to litigate and we’ll see if Canada has something to say about that,” she told reporters at the AFN Assembly Wednesday.

Atikameksheng Anishnawbek First Nation Chief Valerie Richer stood before the assembly Wednesady and appealed directly to Philpott following the minister’s speech.

“We can’t go back to litigation on this,” she said.

“I’m asking you to intervene in that process to make sure [litigation] doesn’t happen.”

Blackstock said the Caring Society, which is a co-complainant on the case alongside the AFN, has “asked Canada to provide the maximum amount to children.”

She said the compensation amount they’re seeking for children is set out in the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Section 53 of the Act says victims are to be compensated “by an amount not exceeding twenty thousand dollars, for any pain and suffering that the victim experienced as a result of the discriminatory practice.”

It also says special compensation of the same amount, $20,000, can be awarded to to victims if the victim was subjected to the discriminatory practice “wilfully or recklessly.”

Blackstock says children who’ve been taken from their families and placed in care, and those who’ve been denied services, are owed both amounts for a total of $40,000 per child.

“Canada knew about the discrimination and they fought against it and they continued to allow these kids to suffer,” she said.

She said it’s not known exactly how many children would qualify for compensation, but the tribunal’s ruling includes “children impacted by child welfare practices on-reserve between 2006 and January 26, 2016,” according to the Caring Society’s website.

Asked what she believes is a fair amount for the children, Philpott would only say that “these are important conversations that have to be had with the parties who are directly affected, and in some cases as individuals.

Indigenous Services Minister Jane Philpott says Canada would like to settle the issue of compensation for First Nations child victims of government discrimination outside the courts. Justin Brake/APTN News.

“We’re prepared to have these conversations with the right people, and as I say ideally to do it outside a court process.”

Blackstock pointed out that Canada’s position on compensation in 2014 at the closing arguments of the tribunal hearings “was that they owed these kids no money, that from their point of view they didn’t discriminate and therefore no compensation should be awarded.”

It’s not clear how far the feds are willing to go in fighting the Caring Society’s request for full compensation as laid out in the Human Rights Act.

“As soon as the parties to the tribunal are happy to drop that legal mechanism and to work with us directly, we would be extremely happy to do so,” Philpott said Wednesday, adding the government has already made strides in addressing issues raised by the tribunal, “including the $1.4 billion we got in 2018 to ensure that we’re paying for the prevention of apprehension of children.

Philpott said it’s “in everyone’s best interest—particularly the interests of the little ones, the children—if we can work in a collaborative way.”

Blackstock said the Caring Society has been in talks with “high level officials” from Indigenous Services Canada and Justice Canada “for many many months” about compensation.

“As far as I’m concerned, if we can settle it and get that support to children sooner then I want to use that pathway,” she said.

“But as always, if there is a rights breach or if Canada is not prepared to fulfill its responsibilities, then for us at the Caring Society, we’re prepared to litigate.”

Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “Canada, advocate at odds over compensation for First Nations child victims of state discrimination”

    Marjorie Blake December 9, 2018 at 3:04 pm #

    we are fighting the system for my grandchildren, discrimination, colonalism all over again, still happening to native people

    Debbie December 7, 2018 at 6:47 pm #

    The amount of money the government,is willing to pay per child is not enough,I was a ward off the government from dec30/1971 to decide 12/1989 and within those years I was abused in everyway imagined. My name is Debbie Joan Crookedlegs

    debra bell December 6, 2018 at 6:45 pm #

    I became a social worker to help children. i worked in bc aboriginal mcfd which was working towards creation and implementation of returning ab foster children to their communities following the community panel consultation in the late 80’s early 90’s
    that was 25 yrs agk and not one inch of movement

    No Name December 6, 2018 at 2:49 pm #

    My poor daughter is in care while I applied for her to be return since I have another who has been in my care since her birth (no concerns completed by mcfd), while my other was removed at birth. Anyway my child in care, the agency she is in care with had a PCA done, and it states that my 3 year old would be an unfit parent when the first born , is born. While my child in care was having weekly sleep overs at our home, transitioning my child home from care, with the pca completed the child protection worker had cut off weekly over nights and cancelled the transition and cut the visits back to twice month. The trauma is growing on her , It is not my child’s best interest to be in care, my child would refuse to get into the car seat by running off saying “I don’t want to go back I want to stay” while that is the voice of a child’s best interest being ignored. Awaiting trials ..

    raymond leibel December 6, 2018 at 12:32 am #

    I now suffer from ptsd, lost my job, sure I’m 64 but the damage was done a long time ago

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *