'Not right:' Outrage after jury finds Saskatchewan farmer not guilty in shooting - APTN NewsAPTN News

‘Not right:’ Outrage after jury finds Saskatchewan farmer not guilty in shooting

The Canadian Press
BATTLEFORD, Sask. – There were sobs of despair and cries of “murderer” in a Saskatchewan courtroom Friday night as a jury found a white farmer not guilty in the shooting death of an Indigenous man.

From the beginning in August 2016, Colten Boushie’s death and the second-degree murder charge against Gerald Stanley exposed an ugly side in rural Saskatchewan – landowners who blame Indigenous people for high rates of property crime and First Nations who bear the brunt of that racism and hate.

Those tensions were on full display as Stanley walked free after the verdict.

Outside court, Boushie’s uncle Alvin Baptiste said there was no justice for his nephew.

“How First Nations are treated in the justice system is not right,” he said.

“A white jury came out with a verdict of not guilty of Gerald Stanley, who shot and killed my nephew. This is how they treat us First Nations people. It is not right. Something has to be done about this – the government, Justin Trudeau, we asked you to give us Indigenous people justice.”

In a tweet late Friday, Trudeau expressed sadness for Boushie’s family.

“I can’t imagine the grief and sorrow the Boushie family is feeling tonight,” he wrote from Los Angeles. “Sending love to them from the U.S.”

The jury deliberated for 13 hours before reaching its decision.

Stanley, 56, turned and looked into the gallery after the verdict came down while Boushie’s family and friends gasped and yelled. Shouts of “murderer” could be heard from those in the gallery.

Boushie’s cousin Jade Tootoosis said the family will push for an appeal.

“There was no justice served here today. We hoped for justice from Colten. However, we did not see it,” she said outside court.

“We will fight for an appeal and answers to all the racism that my family has experienced from the day that Colten was shot, until the jury delivered the verdict of not guilty. We will not stop our pursuit for justice.”

The trial heard that Boushie, from the Red Pheasant First Nation, was shot in the head while he was sitting in an SUV that had been driven onto Stanley’s farm near Biggar, Sask.

The driver of the SUV testified the group had been drinking during the day and tried to break into a truck on a neighbouring farm, but went to the Stanley property in search of help with a flat tire.

Stanley’s son testified that he and his father heard an ATV start up and they thought it was being stolen.

Stanley testified that he fired warning shots to scare the group off. He said that the fatal shot occurred when he reached into the SUV to grab the keys out of the ignition and his gun “just went off.”

The defence drilled into inconsistencies in the testimony of some of the witnesses who were in the SUV with Boushie.

They admitted they lied to investigators about stealing and changed their stories right before taking the witness stand.

The defence argued in its final summation that there was no evidence that Stanley meant to kill Boushie. Lawyer Scott Spencer said the shooting was a freak accident that ended in tragedy.

Crown prosecutor Bill Burge disputed that, arguing that Stanley handled the firearm carelessly and that the only inference was that he pulled the trigger and fired the fatal shot.

Burge said it was clearly an emotional case for the jury.

“One side is very unhappy tonight, but there is never any winner in a case like this,” he said.

“We were there to present the evidence. We didn’t leave anything out that would have made a difference. There was nothing more that could be done. We put it out there. The jury made their decision. That’s their duty and they took it seriously.”

He said the Crown would consider whether there are grounds for an appeal.

Neither Spencer nor Stanley commented Friday night.

Perry Bellegarde, national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, said there was no justice for Boushie.

“We will never give up on justice for First Nations in Saskatchewan or anywhere else in Canada,” he wrote on Twitter. “Our Treaties are about maintaining peace and justice between Nations.”

Racial tensions surrounding the case have been high since the shooting.

Indigenous leaders were upset with an initial report from police that the young people had been taken into custody as part of a theft investigation. Boushie’s relatives said RCMP officers who came to the family home after the shooting were insensitive and treated them like suspects.

On the other side, there were countless racist and hate-filled posts on social media. One municipal councillor wrote that Stanley’s “only mistake was leaving witnesses.” He later resigned.

The highly charged atmosphere prompted then-premier Brad Wall to call for calm.

“This must stop,” he wrote on Facebook. “These comments are not only unacceptable, intolerant and a betrayal of the very values and character of Saskatchewan, they are dangerous.”

Tension continued as the trial began.

The Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations and Boushie’s family raised concerns because there were no visibly Indigenous jurors selected.

There were more pleas for calm from politicians Friday night.

“To all of those who are broken today, please, please remain peaceful,” said Kimberly Jonathan, a vice-chief with Saskatchewan’s Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations.

“It’s not us against them,” the vice-chief said. “We felt unsafe then and we’re still unsafe. Someone can say it’s an accident to shoot any one of us and they are found not guilty.

“Let’s live peaceful, let’s coexist and live peacefully.”

Premier Scott Moe asked people to be measured in their response.

“I know there may be some strong reactions,” Moe said in a statement. “Let us all remember our personal responsibility for our thoughts, our actions, and our comments – including those on social media.

“Let us continue to demonstrate consideration, patience, and understanding for one another as we move forward together in reconciliation.”

Tags: ,

9 Responses to “‘Not right:’ Outrage after jury finds Saskatchewan farmer not guilty in shooting”

  1. calvin_marple@gmail.com'
    Cal February 15, 2018 at 1:37 am #

    Every person in this country should have the right to protect property, home, family and self. The article forgets to mention the other properties these criminals trespassed on and terrorised. It also forgot to mention the firearm that was used to break a window and that was being held by the driver of the car. It is sad that the parents of the young man that was shot did not teach their son that stealing and threatening others is not acceptable. I am saddened by the loss of another young life but in my opinion justice was served. Race does not enter into this. If you break into or enter my property in a threatening manner be prepared to face the consequences

    • M.CressSmith@Gmail.com'
      Mathew February 16, 2018 at 11:41 am #

      I agree wholeheartedly support tge right to protect your land and the people you love. But what I can’t condone the inapt attitude the farmer had for not accepting the responsibility for discharging his rifle at a person and “accidentally” kill a person by a “misfire.” Regardless the farmer should have been charged with either second degree murder; because it may not have been pre-meditated but by firing the gun near them would be considered an attempt to kill. It would have been considered self defence if they had attempted to break into his house or harm him or his family.

  2. Wendypearl@gmail.com'
    Wendy Read February 11, 2018 at 4:16 pm #

    I do not agree anyone should be shot for stealing a vechicle. If it were a white young man would he have been shot. Most likely not.

    Upsets me … disappointed no charge was laid.

    • fzbwfk9r@gmail.com'
      Jon February 16, 2018 at 11:38 am #

      charges WERE laid

      and Boushie was not shot for stealing a vehicle

      he was NOT shot for any reason
      it was most likely an accident.

      the “Bulged Case” was the one piece of evidence that was too hard to get over.
      Even the Crown’s expert witnesses agreed with that

  3. thinktankjf@gmail.com'
    J_F February 11, 2018 at 12:57 pm #

    Ignorance. If i’ve understood the star article correctly. The man who shoots down an empty lane dies at home alone anyways. -J_F

  4. wattsndn@shaw.ca'
    Annie February 11, 2018 at 12:09 am #

    Is there a go fund me page for the family of the murdered man?

  5. olivia_stone52@yahoo.com'
    Olivia February 10, 2018 at 9:15 pm #

    hear they say to us keep calm and not to say anything, we are people and we bleed like them and they think we not gonna say anything about this, it is really heart breaking to see this and to hear it but us native people, have just stood by and did nothing about what they doing to are native people, its about time we stand together and did something about this cause i am tired of this happening to our people

  6. Sekgametsi@hotmail.com'
    Anne February 10, 2018 at 1:19 pm #

    An all white jury? The parallels to stories coming out of South Africa are incredible.

    • 1jthomas@live.com'
      Joanne Thomas February 11, 2018 at 2:44 pm #