APTN National News
The Iroquois Confederacy says the federal Conservative government is planning to end Canada’s obligations to Indigenous peoples and terminate their distinct status in the country.
Haudenosaunee Grand Council, which represents the still existing Iroquois political structure that predates contact with Europeans, said in a statement that the Stephen Harper government aims to destroy “any semblance of nation-to-nation relationships.”
The confederacy said it would also not recognize Bill C-45, the omnibus budget bill the included changes to the Indian Act and withdrew federal oversight over the majority of waterways across the country.
“As the inherent custodians of Haudenosaunee sovereignty within all Haudenosaunee communities and territories, the Haudenosaunee Grand Council is responsible for being ever vigilant and protective against any challenge or threat to our collective sovereignty,” said the statement, dated Dec. 31, 2012. “It is clear that Bill C-45 and subsequent bills seek to destroy our collective sovereignty.”
The confederacy said the Harper government plans to “privatize and enfranchise Indigenous lands and waterways,” along with downloading its federal political responsibilities to the provinces.
“The Haudenosaunee remind the people of Canada of its desired relationship through the tenets of the Two Row Wampum, which champions coexistence and non-interference. Beginning with this basic relationship of mutual respect, our two peoples can resume our journey along the river of life as independent equals and resolve our problems along the way,” said the statement. “Here we shall stand.”
So very sad. What has happened to our Canadian way of respecting people?
Canada signed the Rome Statute: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_apartheid http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/western%20european%20and%20other%20states/Pages/canada.aspx
ICC definition of the crime of apartheid
Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines crimes against humanity as:
Article 7Crimes against humanity
For the purpose of this Statute, ‘crime against humanity’ means any
of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or
systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with
knowledge of the attack:
Murder;
Extermination;
Enslavement;
Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
Torture;
Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy,
enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of
comparable gravity;
Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on
political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as
defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized
as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act
referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of
the Court;
Enforced disappearance of persons;
The crime of apartheid;
Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing
great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical
health.[15]
Later in Article 7, the crime of apartheid is defined as:
The ‘crime of apartheid’ means inhumane acts of a character similar
to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an
institutionalised regime of systematic oppression and domination by one
racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with
the intention of maintaining that regime.[15]
My biggest concern is very specific: The passing of a bill which ‘modifies’ the Indian Act essentially is setting a precedent in regards to that Act’s authority, yet under the recent changes at the CHRA, under International law, noting this includes International Criminal Law any perpetuation of that Act under law is illegal. The Conservative Government of Canada violated International Criminal Law under the Rome Statute, as one of the law’s relate to the Apartheid laws. In doing so, the Canadian Government framed itself as the ‘ruler of law’ in regards to all of these territories regardless of current treaties and additional areas which are in that process. Each relationship is unique, yet this one Act is being perpetuated. We must pursue actions against the Conservative Government in regards to these violations both within Canada and Internationally. Any transitional period between the Indian Act and future framework building is not to be an opportunity for the current regime to break all basic Human Rights standards.http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/western%20european%20and%20other%20states/Pages/canada.aspx and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_apartheid noting many of the apartheid laws were provided by the same Act.
It is important also to note that under the provisions of clause 6 just
quoted, the terms of the treaty were fixed by the governments of the Dominion
and Ontario; the commissioners were empowered to offer certain conditions,
but were not allowed to alter or add to them in the event of their not being
acceptable to the Indians.
http://iportal.usask.ca/docs/ICC/treaties/9_eng.pdf
Overt evil gives something to battle!